A Journalistic Professionalism Trial in Short Video Platform: The Case of Pear Video
Abstract
since 2016. Taking Pear Video as a case to study, it is constantly transforming and seeking new development opportunities in the
exploration of the industries. This case study conducts comprehensive research on it through the research methods of interview
and content analysis. Through the research, it is found that the practical cognition of Pear Video and the judgment of news value
among practitioners tend to be self-evaluation, while the lack of news elements and the incline of news themes is corresponding to
the short video content. Although it seems that the decline of the Pear Video is a failed trial of the integration between the news and
short videos, this pioneering media innovation case still has its essential reference and implications for Chinese media research.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
["[1] Xiang, Y. (2019). User-generated news: Netizen journalism in China in the age of short video. Global Media and China, 4(1), 52-71. ","[2] McIntyre, J. S. (1987). Repositioning a landmark: The Hutchins Commission and freedom of the press. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 4(2), 136-160. ","[3] [7] Pan, Z., & Lu, Y. (2017). Going public: Journalistic professionalism revisited. Journal of International Communication, 10, 91-124. ","[4] Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Investing in online video news: A cross-national analysis of news organizations' enterprising approach to digital media. Journalism studies, 19(15), 2207-2224. ","[5] Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass media research. Cengage learning. ","[6] Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45."]
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i6.2788
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
