Validity and Fairness of TOEFL iBT Reading Test
Abstract
validity of TOEFL scores has been found positive as a whole but in reading comprehension. Four aspects are analyzed to study the
validity of fairness of TOEFL iBT reading test. Results show that reading score are under-represented, with some cognitive validity
issue, negative washback, and unfairness.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Awabdy G W. Background knowledge and its effect on standardized reading comprehension test performance[M]. University of California, Berkeley, 2012.
[2] Clapham C. The development of IELTS: A study of the effect of background on reading comprehension[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[3] Cohen A D, Upton T A. Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks[J]. ETS Research Report Series, 2006, 2006(1): i-162.
[4] Green A. Exploring language assessment and testing: Language in action[M]. Routledge, 2013.
[5] Kim D H, Huynh H. Computer-based and paper-and-pencil administration mode effects on a statewide end-of-course English test[J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008, 68(4): 554-570.
[6] Lim H J. Exploring the validity evidence of the TOEFL IBT reading test from a cognitive perspective[M]. Michigan State University. Second Language Studies, 2014.
[7] Pommerich M. Developing computerized versions of paper-and-pencil tests: Mode effects for passage-based tests[J]. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2004, 2(6).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i8.3094
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
