Research on the Rationality of Creative Behavior Rules in the Field of Artificial Intelligence in Copyright Law
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Yin D. Three views on legal lag (in Chinese). Public Administration & Law 1998; (2): 28–30.
[2] Yi J. Are AI creations works (in Chinese)? Science of Law (Northwest University of Political & Law) 2017; 35(5): 137–147.
[3] Zhang W. Research on the artificial intelligence of judicial adjudication in China [MSc thesis]. Hefei: Anhui University; 2020.
[4] Chen Y. Research on copyright protection of artificial intelligence creations [MSc thesis]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University; 2019.
[5] He P, Jiang Q. Study on the legal nature of “creation” of artificial intelligence. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science) 2020; 34(6): 102–110.
[6] Agnihotri A. A critical review of the idea/expression dichotomy in copyright law. Public Affairs and Governance 2013; 1(2).
[7] Liu W. The research on China’s intellectual property border measures—On the background of TRIPS-plus [MSc thesis]. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; 2019.
[8] Xu M, Tan L. On the protection of artificial intelligence creations through neighboring rights: The theoretical justification and institutional arrangement. Journal of Comparative Law 2018; (6): 42–54.
[9] Wang Z. Research on the protection mode of artificial intelligence generated products neighboring right [MSc thesis]. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University; 2019.
[10] Cao Y. Analysis on the legal subject of intelligent robot (in Chinese) [MSc thesis]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University; 2019.
[11] Xiao X. International comparative studies on the copyright of AI-generated content [MSc thesis]. Shanghai: East China University of Political Science and Law; 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/le.v9i8.1954
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.